Passion UA vs Dynamo Eclot (PSSN.UA-DNE) result: Galaxy Battle STARTER 2025, 28 Mar 2025

34.2%Win probability before the match65.8%
Map 1Dynamo EclotwonMap 2Passion UAPassion UAwonMap 3Dynamo Eclotwon
Watch back
No VOD found for this match yet. Pick a channel above to look for it there.

Passion UA vs Dynamo Eclot: what the model expected

Quick read

  • Rating75 Elo points separate Passion UA (1570) and Dynamo Eclot (1645).
  • Head-to-headPassion UA 2-0 Dynamo Eclot in 2 meetings since 2024. Passion UA took the previous meeting 1-0 at ESEA Advanced Europe season 50 2024 (). More
  • FormPassion UA won 4 of their last 10; Dynamo Eclot won 6 of 10. Dynamo Eclot come in slightly sharper. More
  • Bottom lineBefore the start, Eloline gave Dynamo Eclot a 66% chance. This number was recomputed afterwards from the rating history, not logged before the match.

Passion UA vs Dynamo Eclot: rosters

Passion UAVRS: #223
Dytor
forsyyAWP
M1key
nbqq

Settings source: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0).

Team comparison

Passion UATeamDynamo Eclot
56% (235-185)Map win rate56% (268-212)
37-34Deciding maps won–lost48-35
55%Series wins without dropping a map50%
46 minAverage map length45 min
43%CT-side rounds won53%
33%First half won38%
OpenTeam pageOpen

Source: Liquipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0

Passion UA vs Dynamo Eclot: meetings before this one

2 meetings · Most recent: 1–0 to Passion UA ()

All 2 meetings

Passion UA and Dynamo Eclot: form going into the match

Passion UA · 4 of 10 wonDynamo Eclot · 6 of 10 won
WGTZ.Esports2–1
LNIP0–2
WSashi Esport2–0
LZero Tenacity1–2
LBIG1–2
LBC.Game Esports0–2
W5002–1
LNAVI Junior0–2
LOG0–2
WBC.Game Esports2–1
LIberian Soul0–2
WOG2–0
LWild Lotus1–2
WAurora Gaming3–1
WSinners2–0
WZennoX1–0
WkONO.ECF2–0
L1WIN0–2
WAurora Gaming2–0
L5000–2

Map pool: how both teams fare on each map

Passion UAWin %Dynamo Eclot
67%6 mapsWWLWL
Mirage
63%8 mapsLLWWW
43%7 mapsWLLWL
Ancient
33%3 mapsLWL
–
Nuke
38%8 mapsLWLLW
0%4 mapsLLLL
Anubis
0%2 mapsLL
50%2 mapsLW
Inferno
50%2 mapsLW
0%3 mapsLLL
Dust II
–
–
Train
0%1 mapsL

Liquipedia CC BY-SA