B8 vs Zero Tenacity (B8-Z10) result: ESL Challenger League Europe season 49 2025, 6 May 2025

73.2%Win probability before the match26.8%
Map 1B8B8wonMap 2B8B8won
Watch back
No VOD found for this match yet. Pick a channel above to look for it there.

B8 vs Zero Tenacity: what the model expected

Quick read

  • Rating116 Elo points separate B8 (1727) and Zero Tenacity (1611).
  • Head-to-headB8 3-5 Zero Tenacity in 8 meetings since 2024. Zero Tenacity took the previous meeting 2-0 at ESL Challenger League Europe season 49 2025 (). More
  • FormB8 won 7 of their last 10; Zero Tenacity won 7 of 10. Neither side has the better run of results. More
  • Bottom lineBefore the start, Eloline gave B8 a 73% chance. This number was recomputed afterwards from the rating history, not logged before the match.

B8 vs Zero Tenacity: rosters

B8Elo: #22VRS: #13
IGL
AWP
IGL

Settings source: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0).

Team comparison

B8TeamZero Tenacity
62% (207-128)Map win rate56% (256-201)
38-20Deciding maps won–lost45-36
57%Series wins without dropping a map57%
46 minAverage map length46 min
59%CT-side rounds won46%
56%First half won42%
OpenTeam pageOpen

Source: Liquipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0

B8 vs Zero Tenacity: meetings before this one

B8B8B83wins5winsZero TenacityZero Tenacity

8 meetings · Most recent: 2–0 to Zero Tenacity ()

All 8 meetings

B8 and Zero Tenacity: form going into the match

B8 · 7 of 10 wonZero Tenacity · 7 of 10 won
WChinggis Warriors2–0
LBIG1–2
WJiJieHao2–0
LBIG0–2
WThe Huns Esports2–1
LHeroic0–2
WBetBoom Team2–1
WHeroic2–1
WPartizan Esport2–1
WAstralis2–1
WRUBY2–1
LOG0–2
WSashi Esport2–0
WUNiTY esports2–0
LAMKAL ESPORTS1–2
WUNiTY esports2–0
WSabre Esports2–0
LMonte0–2
WIberian Soul2–1
WAMKAL ESPORTS2–1

Map pool: how both teams fare on each map

B8Win %Zero Tenacity
83%18 mapsWWWWL
Mirage
60%5 mapsWLWWL
56%9 mapsWLWWL
Dust II
25%4 mapsLLWL
73%11 mapsWWWLW
Ancient
–
50%4 mapsWLLW
Anubis
43%7 mapsLWLWL
100%3 mapsWWW
Nuke
75%8 mapsWWWLL
33%6 mapsWWLLL
Inferno
50%4 mapsLWWL
50%2 mapsWL
Train
0%1 mapsL

Liquipedia CC BY-SA