Hashiras vs Bebop result: CCT Europe Closed Qualifier: Series #3 2026, 20 May 2026

43.7%Win probability before the match56.3%
Map 1HAwonMap 2HAwon
Watch back
No VOD found for this match yet. Pick a channel above to look for it there.

Hashiras vs Bebop: what the model expected

Quick read

  • Rating30 Elo points separate Hashiras (1535) and Bebop (1565).
  • Head-to-headHashiras 0-1 Bebop in 1 meeting since 2024. Bebop took the previous meeting 2-1 at NODWIN Clutch Series Season 7 2026 (). More
  • FormHashiras won 5 of their last 10; Bebop won 5 of 10. Neither side has the better run of results. More
  • Bottom lineBefore the start, Eloline gave Bebop a 56% chance. This number was recomputed afterwards from the rating history, not logged before the match.

Hashiras vs Bebop: rosters

HashirasVRS: #238
BebopElo: #276VRS: #212
IGL
iDISBALANCEAWP

Settings source: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0).

Team comparison

HashirasTeamBebop
45% (31-38)Map win rate52% (100-92)
4-7Deciding maps won–lost20-18
67%Series wins without dropping a map51%
47 minAverage map length44 min
43%CT-side rounds won49%
47%First half won37%
OpenTeam pageOpen

Source: Liquipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0

Hashiras vs Bebop: meetings before this one

1 meeting · Most recent: 2–1 to Bebop ()

The only meeting

Hashiras and Bebop: form going into the match

Hashiras · 5 of 10 wonBebop · 5 of 10 wonWonLost
147915151551158715301561147915151551158715301561
Elo after each match · oldernewer
WYoung Ninjas2–0
LYoung Ninjas0–2
L20071–2
LLavked0–2
WCYBERSHOKE Prospects2–0
LTeam Nemesis0–2
WPhantom2–1
WRUSTEC2–0
LBebop1–2
WUNiTY esports2–0
WMisa Esports2–0
LUNiTY esports0–2
WASTRAL2–0
WHEROIC Academy2–1
WHEROIC Academy2–0
LINOX Division0–2
LUrsa0–2
WMANA eSports2–0
LLavked0–2
L1WIN0–2

Map pool: how both teams fare on each map

HashirasWin %Bebop
17%6 mapsLLLLW
Nuke
54%13 mapsWWWLW
–
Mirage
61%18 mapsLWWLL
50%6 mapsWWLLL
Ancient
17%6 mapsLLLWL
0%2 mapsLL
Inferno
38%8 mapsLLLWL
0%2 mapsLL
Dust II
29%7 mapsLLLWL
50%2 mapsWL
Overpass
0%1 mapsL
–
Anubis
100%3 mapsWWW

Liquipedia CC BY-SA