NIP vs GamerLegion (NIP-GL) result: RES Showdown Spring 2026, 8 Feb 2026

40.6%Win probability before the match59.4%
Watch back
RES Showdown Spring 2026 · Grand finalNIPNIPNIPNIPNIPGamerLegionGamerLegionGamerLegionVS
REPLAYYouTube · RLG · EN

NIP vs GamerLegion: what the model expected

Quick read

  • Rating44 Elo points separate NIP (1727) and GamerLegion (1771).
  • Head-to-headThese teams have not met yet.
  • FormNIP won 7 of their last 10; GamerLegion won 6 of 10. NIP come in slightly sharper. More
  • Bottom lineBefore the start, Eloline gave GamerLegion a 59% chance. This number was recomputed afterwards from the rating history, not logged before the match.

NIP vs GamerLegion: rosters

NIPElo: #12VRS: #18
AWP
sjuush
Snappi
r1nkleProfile
Player comparison12 months before this match
53%Win rate47%
58Matches, 12 months43
7/10Last 10 matches6/10
won 2Current streakwon 2
21Age22
04/2024On the team since09/2025
1200eDPI–
HypexProfile
GamerLegionElo: #46VRS: #27
AWP
REZAWP
SnaxIGL
Tauson

Settings source: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0).

Team comparison

NIPTeamGamerLegion
57% (125-94)Map win rate51% (99-97)
14-19Deciding maps won–lost18-15
70%Series wins without dropping a map57%
46 minAverage map length50 min
56%CT-side rounds won49%
62%First half won51%
OpenTeam pageOpen

Source: Liquipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0

NIP and GamerLegion: form going into the match

NIP · 7 of 10 wonGamerLegion · 6 of 10 won
Wm1x2–1
WGentle Mates2–1
LBC.Game Esports0–2
WPassion UA2–1
LLiquid0–2
LLiquid1–2
WSAW2–0
WGentle Mates2–0
WFC Famalicão Esports2–0
WASTRAL2–0
WBC.Game Esports2–0
Wex-RUBY2–1
LAstralis0–2
WHeroic2–0
LAurora Gaming0–2
LBET-M 330–2
LVitality0–2
WAurora Gaming2–1
WPassion UA2–1
WM802–0

Map pool: how both teams fare on each map

NIPWin %GamerLegion
38%13 mapsLLLWL
Nuke
33%12 mapsLLLLW
0%4 mapsLLLL
Inferno
44%18 mapsLLWWW
33%3 mapsLWL
Overpass
53%19 mapsLWLWW
20%5 mapsLWLLL
Dust II
38%13 mapsLLLLL
67%9 mapsWWWLL
Train
43%7 mapsLWWLW
33%6 mapsWLLLL
Ancient
30%10 mapsLLLWW
50%2 mapsWL
Mirage
75%4 mapsWLWW
100%1 mapsW
Anubis
–

Liquipedia CC BY-SA