Oramond vs Nuclear TigeRES (ORM-NTR) result: NODWIN Clutch Series Season 3 2025, 3 Dec 2025

53.5%Win probability before the match46.5%
Map 1OramondwonMap 2Oramondwon
Watch back
No VOD found for this match yet. Pick a channel above to look for it there.

Oramond vs Nuclear TigeRES: what the model expected

Quick read

  • Rating16 Elo points separate Oramond (1752) and Nuclear TigeRES (1736).
  • Head-to-headOramond 2-0 Nuclear TigeRES in 2 meetings since 2024. Oramond took the previous meeting 2-1 at CCT Europe Series #10 season 3 2025 (). More
  • FormOramond won 8 of their last 10; Nuclear TigeRES won 7 of 10. Oramond come in slightly sharper. More
  • Bottom lineBefore the start, Eloline gave Oramond a 54% chance. This number was recomputed afterwards from the rating history, not logged before the match.

Oramond vs Nuclear TigeRES: rosters

Nuclear TigeRESElo: #48VRS: #46
IGL
IGL
AWP

Settings source: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0).

Team comparison

OramondTeamNuclear TigeRES
57% (62-46)Map win rate61% (159-103)
14-2Deciding maps won–lost21-15
53%Series wins without dropping a map63%
39 minAverage map length43 min
52%CT-side rounds won58%
53%First half won70%
OpenTeam pageOpen

Source: Liquipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0

Oramond vs Nuclear TigeRES: meetings before this one

2 meetings · Most recent: 2–1 to Oramond ()

All 2 meetings

Oramond and Nuclear TigeRES: form going into the match

Oramond · 8 of 10 wonNuclear TigeRES · 7 of 10 won
WNemiga2–0
WEternal Fire2–1
WFORZE Reload2–0
LFavbet1–2
LBetBoom Team0–2
WkONO.ECF2–0
WNemiga2–1
WCYBERSHOKE Esports2–1
WVenom2–0
W1WIN2–1
WFire Flux Esports2–1
WEternal Fire2–0
LCopenhagen Wolves1–2
WHAVU2–0
LHeroic0–2
WZero Tenacity2–1
WCopenhagen Wolves2–0
WFavbet2–0
LBetera Esports1–2
WMonte2–0

Map pool: how both teams fare on each map

OramondWin %Nuclear TigeRES
85%13 mapsWWWLW
Mirage
50%6 mapsWLWWL
88%8 mapsWWWWW
Ancient
70%10 mapsLWWWL
17%6 mapsLLLWL
Dust II
60%5 mapsLLWWW
25%4 mapsLLLW
Inferno
83%6 mapsLWWWW
50%4 mapsWLWL
Train
67%3 mapsLWW
67%3 mapsLWW
Nuke
67%3 mapsWWL

Liquipedia CC BY-SA