HOTU vs WHITEBIRD (HOTU-WB) result: NODWIN Clutch Series Season 5 2026, 2 Mar 2026

64%Win probability before the match36%
Map 1HOTUHOTUwonMap 2WHITEBIRDWHITEBIRDwonMap 3HOTUHOTUwon
Watch back
No VOD found for this match yet. Pick a channel above to look for it there.

HOTU vs WHITEBIRD: what the model expected

Quick read

  • Rating67 Elo points separate HOTU (1750) and WHITEBIRD (1683).
  • Head-to-headThese teams have not met yet.
  • FormHOTU won 8 of their last 10; WHITEBIRD won 8 of 10. Neither side has the better run of results. More
  • Bottom lineBefore the start, Eloline gave HOTU a 64% chance. This number was recomputed afterwards from the rating history, not logged before the match.

HOTU vs WHITEBIRD: rosters

HOTUElo: #30VRS: #31
dukefissuraIGL
AWP
n0rb3r7
frontalesProfile
Player comparison12 months before this match
71%Win rate–
31Matches, 12 months–
8/10Last 10 matches–
won 1Current streak–
23Age26
07/2025On the team since01/2026
800eDPI800
El1an
El1anProfile
El1anAWP
Forester
Lack1IGL
NickelBackIGL
TRAVIS

Settings source: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0).

Team comparison

HOTUTeamWHITEBIRD
63% (130-76)Map win rate60% (55-37)
18-12Deciding maps won–lost10-5
66%Series wins without dropping a map60%
45 minAverage map length49 min
55%CT-side rounds won56%
59%First half won53%
OpenTeam pageOpen

Source: Liquipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0

HOTU and WHITEBIRD: form going into the match

HOTU · 8 of 10 wonWHITEBIRD · 8 of 10 won
WWATERMELON2–1
LOmega1–2
WAltay Esports2–1
LOmega0–1
WTeam Novaq1–0
WWATERMELON1–0
WMeta Esports1–0
WGentle Mates2–1
Wfnatic2–0
WBetclic Apogee Esports2–0
WMOUZ NXT2–0
WTDK2–1
WSinners2–0
WBASEMENT BOYS2–0
WAlliance2–0
LLeo Team0–2
Wmagic2–1
Wlos kogutos2–0
Lex-RUBY0–2
WOmega2–1

Map pool: how both teams fare on each map

HOTUWin %WHITEBIRD
71%7 mapsWLLWW
Dust II
83%12 mapsLWWWW
50%10 mapsLLLWW
Overpass
67%6 mapsWWLWW
71%7 mapsWLLWW
Mirage
75%4 mapsWWWL
60%5 mapsLWWWL
Ancient
50%4 mapsLLWW
75%4 mapsWWWL
Nuke
33%3 mapsWLL
–
Inferno
60%5 mapsWWLLW
50%2 mapsLW
Anubis
–
50%2 mapsWL
Train
–

Liquipedia CC BY-SA