ECHO vs OG result: Esports World Cup Open Qualifier 2026, 8 Aug 2026

67.9%Win probability before the match32.1%
Watch back
No VOD found for this match yet. Pick a channel above to look for it there.

ECHO vs OG: maps, round scores and veto

MAP 1Cache60 min
ECHO
13
CT8:4T5:1
OG
5
MAP 2Nuke41 min
ECHO
8
T6:6CT2:7
OG
13
MAP 3Mirage42 min
ECHO
13
CT6:6T7:1
OG
7

Liquipedia CC BY-SA

ECHO vs OG: what the model expected

Quick read

  • Rating86 Elo points separate ECHO (1797) and OG (1711).
  • Head-to-headThese teams have not met yet.
  • FormECHO won 7 of their last 10; OG won 4 of 10. ECHO are in much better shape. More
  • Bottom lineBefore the start, Eloline gave ECHO a 68% chance. This number was recomputed afterwards from the rating history, not logged before the match.

ECHO vs OG: rosters

ECHOElo: #44
IceBergIGL
AWP
salazarProfile
Player comparison12 months before this match
61%Win rate49%
70Matches, 12 months35
7/10Last 10 matches4/10
won 1Current streakwon 1
21Age31
06/2026On the team since11/2025
940eDPI916
cadiaN
cadiaNProfile
OGElo: #95VRS: #107
Adamb
bodyyIGL
cadiaNAWP

Settings source: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0).

Team comparison

ECHOTeamOG
61% (19-12)Map win rate57% (97-73)
4-1Deciding maps won–lost15-15
56%Series wins without dropping a map59%
48 minAverage map length50 min
OpenTeam pageOpen

ECHO and OG: form going into the match

ECHO · 7 of 10 wonOG · 4 of 10 wonWonLost
167217311791185017971709167217311791185017971709
Elo after each match · oldernewer
WPassion Chicha2–0
LAurora Gaming0–2
WNuclear TigeRES2–0
LNIP0–2
WNuclear TigeRES2–0
WSharks2–1
LAcend1–2
WWalczaki2–1
WFOKUS2–0
WBetclic Apogee Esports2–0
WVael2–0
LSpirit1–2
LBetclic Apogee Esports1–2
LFOKUS1–2
LTDK1–2
WJust Players2–0
WEsport Academy Copenhagen2–1
LInner Circle Esports1–2
WRebels Gaming1–0
LBetclic Apogee Esports0–1

Map pool: how both teams fare on each map

ECHOWin %OG
–
Ancient
50%8 mapsWLLLW
–
Dust II
57%7 mapsWWWLL
–
Overpass
50%6 mapsLWLWW
–
Inferno
80%5 mapsLWWWW
100%1 mapsW
Nuke
33%3 mapsWLL
100%1 mapsW
Cache
0%1 mapsL

Liquipedia CC BY-SA