AllCS2ValorantR6

G2 vs Complexity (G2-coL) result: PGL Bucharest 2025, 8 Apr 2025

G2G2#17 · Elo 18662ComplexityComplexityElo 17361
PGL Bucharest 2025 · Group StageMatch overBO3LAN
75.7%Win probability before the match24.3%
Map 1Dust IIG216-12Map 2AnubisComplexity10-13Map 3AncientG213-10
Watch back
PGL Bucharest 2025 · Round 3G2G2G2ComplexityComplexityComplexityVS
REPLAYYouTube · PGL · EN

Watch each map again

Watch on YouTube · YouTube ↗

G2 vs Complexity: maps, round scores and veto

MAP 1Dust II57 min▶
G2
16
T10:2CT2:10OT1 CT3:0OT1 T1:0
Complexity
12
MAP 2Anubis47 min▶
G2
10
T6:6CT4:7
Complexity
13
MAP 3Ancient46 min▶
G2
13
T7:5CT6:5
Complexity
10

Liquipedia CC BY-SA

G2 vs Complexity: what the model expected

Quick read

  • Rating130 Elo points separate G2 (1866) and Complexity (1736).
  • Head-to-headThese teams have not met yet.
  • FormG2 won 6 of their last 10; Complexity won 10 of 10. Complexity are in much better shape. More
  • Bottom lineBefore the start, Eloline gave G2 a 76% chance. This number was recomputed afterwards from the rating history, not logged before the match.

G2 vs Complexity: rosters

G2Elo: #17VRS: #5
huNter-IGL
m0NESYAWP
malbsMd
SnaxIGL
m0NESY
m0NESYProfile
Player comparison12 months before this match
19Age24
05/2023On the team since01/2025
800eDPI–
cxzi
cxziProfile
Complexity
cxziAWP
Grim
hallzerkAWP
JTIGL

Settings source: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0).

Team comparison

G2TeamComplexity
63% (117-68)Map win rate56% (79-62)
19-12Deciding maps won–lost10-6
59%Series wins without dropping a map68%
49 minAverage map length46 min
50%CT-side rounds won51%
51%First half won59%
OpenTeam pageOpen

Source: Liquipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0

G2 and Complexity: form going into the match

G2 · 6 of 10 wonComplexity · 10 of 10 won
G2G2See all
WRare Atom2–0
WGamerLegion2–0
LMOUZ0–2
WThe MongolZ2–0
WM802–0
LEternal Fire0–2
WImperial2–0
LMOUZ1–2
WGamerLegion2–0
LNatus Vincere0–2
ComplexityComplexitySee all
WFURIA2–1
WTeam Falcons2–0
WPassion UA1–0
W9 Pandas1–0
WMetizport1–0
WImperial Female1–0
WNemiga1–0
WWildcard3–0
WBLUEJAYS2–1
WLFO 42–0

Map pool: how both teams fare on each map

G2Win %Complexity
73%11 mapsWLWLW
Inferno
25%4 mapsWLLL
50%10 mapsLLWWW
Ancient
25%4 mapsLWLL
78%9 mapsLLWWW
Dust II
20%5 mapsLWLLL
57%7 mapsWLLWW
Mirage
–
43%7 mapsWWWLL
Nuke
–
–
Train
60%5 mapsWWWLL
33%3 mapsWLL
Anubis
0%1 mapsL

Liquipedia CC BY-SA