K27 vs 100 Thieves (K27-100T) result: PGL Astana: European Closed Qualifier 2026, 3 Apr 2026

58.5%Win probability before the match41.5%
Map 1100 Thieves100 ThieveswonMap 2K27wonMap 3K27won
Watch back
No VOD found for this match yet. Pick a channel above to look for it there.

K27 vs 100 Thieves: what the model expected

Quick read

  • Rating40 Elo points separate K27 (1788) and 100 Thieves (1748).
  • Head-to-headThese teams have not met yet.
  • FormK27 won 7 of their last 10; 100 Thieves won 7 of 10. Neither side has the better run of results. More
  • Bottom lineBefore the start, Eloline gave K27 a 59% chance. This number was recomputed afterwards from the rating history, not logged before the match.

K27 vs 100 Thieves: rosters

K27Elo: #45VRS: #32
AWP
IGL
kashl1dProfile
Player comparison12 months before this match
75%Win rate66%
32Matches, 12 months62
7/10Last 10 matches7/10
lost 1Current streakwon 3
19Age23
10/2024On the team since02/2026
800eDPI660
100 ThievesElo: #27VRS: #28
device
rainIGL

Settings source: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0).

Team comparison

K27Team100 Thieves
66% (273-142)Map win rate66% (35-18)
38-20Deciding maps won–lost5-4
65%Series wins without dropping a map58%
45 minAverage map length47 min
58%CT-side rounds won52%
47%First half won44%
OpenTeam pageOpen

Source: Liquipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0

K27 and 100 Thieves: form going into the match

K27 · 7 of 10 won100 Thieves · 7 of 10 wonWonLost
172217491777180517791748172217491777180517791748
Elo after each match · oldernewer
Lmagic0–2
W1WIN2–0
WLavked2–0
WWW Team2–0
LNemiga1–2
L1WIN0–2
WTeam Nemesis2–0
Wex-RUBY2–1
WBIG2–1
WUrsa2–0
WACROBATS2–1
WLavked2–1
WHOTU2–1
Lmagic1–2
LAM Gaming0–2
LJohnny Speeds1–2
WFOKUS2–1
WMASONIC1–0
WAaB Esport1–0
WSashi Esport1–0

Map pool: how both teams fare on each map

K27Win %100 Thieves
67%9 mapsLLWLW
Dust II
67%3 mapsLWW
40%5 mapsWLLWL
Ancient
50%2 mapsLW
75%4 mapsWLWW
Nuke
33%3 mapsWLL
40%5 mapsWWLLL
Overpass
–
100%5 mapsWWWWW
Mirage
–
75%4 mapsWLWW
Anubis
–
50%2 mapsLW
Train
–
0%1 mapsL
Inferno
100%1 mapsW

Liquipedia CC BY-SA