paiN vs Complexity (paiN-coL) result: IEM Melbourne 2025, 22 Apr 2025

paiNpaiNpaiN#54 · Elo 16940ComplexityComplexityElo 17722
IEM Melbourne 2025 · Group AMatch overBO3LAN
33.8%Win probability before the match66.2%
Watch back
No VOD found for this match yet. Pick a channel above to look for it there.

Watch each map again

Watch on YouTube · YouTube ↗

paiN vs Complexity: maps, round scores and veto

MAP 1Train28 min▶
paiN
2
CT2:10T0:3
Complexity
13
MAP 2Anubis36 min▶
paiN
6
CT5:7T1:6
Complexity
13

Liquipedia CC BY-SA

paiN vs Complexity: what the model expected

Quick read

  • Rating78 Elo points separate paiN (1694) and Complexity (1772).
  • Head-to-headpaiN 0-1 Complexity in 1 meeting since 2024. Complexity took the previous meeting 1-0 at PGL Major Copenhagen 2024 (). More
  • FormpaiN won 3 of their last 10; Complexity won 6 of 10. Complexity are in much better shape. More
  • Bottom lineBefore the start, Eloline gave Complexity a 66% chance. This number was recomputed afterwards from the rating history, not logged before the match.

paiN vs Complexity: rosters

paiNElo: #54VRS: #54
dav1deuS
AWP
Snowzin
Player comparison12 months before this match
20Age24
11/2023On the team since01/2025
960eDPI–
cxziAWP
Grim
hallzerkAWP
JTIGL

Settings source: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0).

Team comparison

paiNTeamComplexity
63% (183-107)Map win rate56% (89-71)
26-11Deciding maps won–lost11-8
59%Series wins without dropping a map69%
48 minAverage map length47 min
48%CT-side rounds won47%
44%First half won48%
OpenTeam pageOpen

Source: Liquipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0

paiN vs Complexity: meetings before this one

1 meeting · Most recent: 1–0 to Complexity ()

The only meeting

paiN and Complexity: form going into the match

paiN · 3 of 10 wonComplexity · 6 of 10 won
LFaZe0–2
LTeam Falcons1–2
LFaZe0–2
LAurora Gaming1–2
LEternal Fire0–2
LNatus Vincere0–2
WGamerLegion2–1
LG20–2
WNemiga2–1
WLynn Vision2–1
LThe MongolZ1–2
WBLUEJAYS2–0
WGetting Info2–0
LFaZe0–2
LG20–2
WAurora Gaming2–1
WFaZe2–0
LG21–2
WFURIA2–1
WTeam Falcons2–0

Map pool: how both teams fare on each map

paiNWin %Complexity
19%16 mapsLWLLL
Inferno
17%6 mapsLLWLL
45%11 mapsWLWLL
Dust II
22%9 mapsLLWLL
54%13 mapsLLWWL
Mirage
–
75%12 mapsLWLLW
Nuke
100%1 mapsW
25%4 mapsLLWL
Anubis
50%6 mapsWLLWW
0%3 mapsLLL
Train
67%6 mapsWWWWL
–
Ancient
17%6 mapsLLLWL

Liquipedia CC BY-SA