Complexity vs TYLOO (coL-TYLOO) result: IEM Cologne 2025, 24 Jul 2025

ComplexityComplexityElo 17441TYLOOTYLOO#31 · Elo 18002
IEM Cologne 2025 · Play-InMatch overBO3LAN
38.2%Win probability before the match61.8%
Watch back
IEM Cologne 2025 · Lower bracket round 1 match 3ComplexityComplexityComplexityTYLOOTYLOOTYLOOVS
REPLAYYouTube · ESL Counter-Strike · EN

Watch each map again

Watch on YouTube · YouTube ↗

Complexity vs TYLOO: maps, round scores and veto

MAP 1Overpass53 min▶
Complexity
13
T7:5CT6:6
TYLOO
11
MAP 2Inferno43 min▶
Complexity
6
CT4:8T2:5
TYLOO
13
MAP 3Ancient45 min▶
Complexity
11
CT7:5T4:8
TYLOO
13

Liquipedia CC BY-SA

Complexity vs TYLOO: what the model expected

Quick read

  • Rating56 Elo points separate Complexity (1744) and TYLOO (1800).
  • Head-to-headComplexity 0-1 TYLOO in 1 meeting since 2024. TYLOO took the previous meeting 2-0 at BLAST.tv Major Austin 2025 (). More
  • FormComplexity won 4 of their last 10; TYLOO won 6 of 10. TYLOO come in slightly sharper. More
  • Bottom lineBefore the start, Eloline gave TYLOO a 62% chance. This number was recomputed afterwards from the rating history, not logged before the match.

Complexity vs TYLOO: rosters

cxziAWP
Grim
hallzerkAWP
JTIGL
Player comparison12 months before this match
–Win rate50%
–Matches, 12 months10
–Last 10 matches5/10
–Current streaklost 1
25Age20
01/2025On the team since07/2024
TYLOOElo: #31VRS: #44
JamYoung
AWP
MercuryIGL
IGL

Settings source: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0).

Team comparison

ComplexityTeamTYLOO
54% (79-67)Map win rate69% (116-53)
9-8Deciding maps won–lost6-10
71%Series wins without dropping a map69%
47 minAverage map length46 min
51%CT-side rounds won49%
48%First half won49%
OpenTeam pageOpen

Source: Liquipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0

Complexity vs TYLOO: meetings before this one

1 meeting · Most recent: 2–0 to TYLOO ()

The only meeting

Complexity and TYLOO: form going into the match

Complexity · 4 of 10 wonTYLOO · 6 of 10 won
LGamerLegion0–2
LSAW1–2
WBIG2–1
WBetBoom Team2–1
LTYLOO0–2
LNRG0–1
WFluxo1–0
LOG0–1
LGamerLegion1–2
WpaiN2–0
LVirtus.pro0–2
WAstralis3–1
WSAW2–0
W3DMAX2–0
WAstralis2–1
WVirtus.pro2–0
LHeroic1–2
LLynn Vision0–1
LFaZe0–1
WM801–0

Map pool: how both teams fare on each map

ComplexityWin %TYLOO
27%11 mapsWLLWL
Inferno
60%15 mapsLLWWW
56%9 mapsLWWWL
Anubis
44%9 mapsWLLWL
25%8 mapsLLLWL
Ancient
50%8 mapsWWWLL
70%10 mapsWLLWW
Train
67%3 mapsLWW
33%6 mapsLLWLL
Nuke
60%5 mapsWWLLW
22%9 mapsLWLLL
Dust II
–
–
Mirage
57%7 mapsWWLWW
–
Overpass
0%1 mapsL

Liquipedia CC BY-SA