MIBR vs 100 Thieves (MIBR-100T) result: Stake Pulse Beat III 2026, 17 Oct 2026

50.3%Win probability before the match49.7%
Watch back
Stake Pulse Beat III 2026 · Semifinal 2MIBRMIBRMIBRMIBRMIBR100 Thieves100 Thieves100 Thieves100 Thieves100 ThievesVS
REPLAYYouTube · cs2.Streams · EN

MIBR vs 100 Thieves: maps, round scores and veto

MAP 1Nuke44 min
MIBR
13
T5:7CT8:1
100 Thieves
8
MAP 2Mirage52 min
MIBR
13
CT5:7T8:3
100 Thieves
10

Liquipedia CC BY-SA

MIBR vs 100 Thieves: what the model expected

Quick read

  • Rating1 Elo point separates MIBR (1854) and 100 Thieves (1853).
  • Head-to-headMIBR 1-0 100 Thieves in 1 meeting since 2024. MIBR took the previous meeting 2-0 at ESL Pro League North America season 11 2020 (). More
  • FormMIBR won 6 of their last 10; 100 Thieves won 8 of 10. 100 Thieves come in slightly sharper. More
  • Bottom lineBefore the start Eloline rated this a coin flip (50% for the side it leaned to); MIBR took it.

MIBR vs 100 Thieves: rosters

MIBRElo: #14VRS: #12
LNZIGL
AWP
tomaszin
Player comparison12 months before this match
56%Win rate64%
71Matches, 12 months99
6/10Last 10 matches7/10
won 4Current streaklost 1
21Age31
07/2026On the team since02/2026
960eDPI–
device
deviceProfile
100 ThievesElo: #27VRS: #28
device
IGL
rainIGL

Settings source: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0).

Team comparison

MIBRTeam100 Thieves
60% (112-74)Map win rate64% (121-67)
15-12Deciding maps won–lost14-15
67%Series wins without dropping a map69%
48 minAverage map length46 min
58%CT-side rounds won57%
56%First half won57%
OpenTeam pageOpen

Source: Liquipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0

MIBR vs 100 Thieves: meetings before this one

1 meeting · Most recent: 2–0 to MIBR ()

The only meeting

MIBR and 100 Thieves: form going into the match

MIBR · 6 of 10 won100 Thieves · 8 of 10 wonWonLost
180218291856188418481847180218291856188418481847
Elo after each match · oldernewer
WAstralis2–1
WBC.Game Esports2–1
WEnvy2–0
LBC.Game Esports1–2
LFURIA0–2
WNRG2–0
Wmagic2–1
LFURIA1–2
LLegacy1–2
WAlliance2–0
WSangal2–0
WLiquid2–1
WJiJieHao2–0
LJiJieHao1–2
WVoca2–0
LSinners0–1
WEternal Fire1–0
WNordic Partners Gaming1–0
WLilmix1–0
WAnteiku1–0

Map pool: how both teams fare on each map

MIBRWin %100 Thieves
50%16 mapsLLLWW
Mirage
57%7 mapsWLWWW
54%13 mapsWWWWL
Ancient
70%10 mapsWWLWW
53%15 mapsWWWWL
Inferno
50%6 mapsLWLLW
36%11 mapsWLLLL
Nuke
44%9 mapsWLLWW
–
Dust II
83%18 mapsWWWWW
80%5 mapsWWWLW
Anubis
38%8 mapsLLWWL
67%6 mapsWLWLW
Cache
100%1 mapsW
0%1 mapsL
Overpass
–

Liquipedia CC BY-SA

Bracket path