illwill vs AM Gaming (ILWL-AM) result: NODWIN Clutch Series Season 6 2026, 1 Apr 2026

58.5%Win probability before the match41.5%
Map 1illwillwonMap 2illwillwon
Watch back
No VOD found for this match yet. Pick a channel above to look for it there.

illwill vs AM Gaming: what the model expected

Quick read

  • Rating39 Elo points separate illwill (1671) and AM Gaming (1632).
  • Head-to-headillwill 2-0 AM Gaming in 2 meetings since 2024. illwill took the previous meeting 2-0 at NODWIN Clutch Series Season 5 2026 (). More
  • Formillwill won 5 of their last 10; AM Gaming won 6 of 10. AM Gaming come in slightly sharper. More
  • Bottom lineBefore the start, Eloline gave illwill a 59% chance. This number was recomputed afterwards from the rating history, not logged before the match.

illwill vs AM Gaming: rosters

illwillVRS: #255
AM GamingVRS: #232
Altekz
k1to
kyuubii
AWP
myltsiAWP

Settings source: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0).

Team comparison

illwillTeamAM Gaming
63% (102-61)Map win rate53% (109-95)
16-8Deciding maps won–lost14-16
63%Series wins without dropping a map63%
45 minAverage map length44 min
48%CT-side rounds won45%
38%First half won29%
OpenTeam pageOpen

Source: Liquipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0

illwill vs AM Gaming: meetings before this one

2 meetings · Most recent: 2–0 to illwill ()

All 2 meetings

illwill and AM Gaming: form going into the match

illwill · 5 of 10 wonAM Gaming · 6 of 10 wonWonLost
162416711718176516741632162416711718176516741632
Elo after each match · oldernewer
LWW Team1–2
LLavked0–2
WRebels Gaming2–1
LMetizport0–2
WTeam Novaq2–0
WUrsa2–0
LBIG0–2
LGamerLegion0–2
WSinners2–0
WAM Gaming2–0
LPhantom1–2
LAaB Esport1–2
LB80–1
WWAZABI1–0
WPhantom1–0
WZ7 Esports1–0
WTricked2–0
LAKPO6ATbI0–2
Wmellren2–0
WSTATE1–0

Map pool: how both teams fare on each map

illwillWin %AM Gaming
75%4 mapsWWWL
Dust II
50%6 mapsLLWWL
33%6 mapsWLLLL
Mirage
67%3 mapsWWL
80%5 mapsWWWLW
Nuke
0%4 mapsLLLL
–
Ancient
29%7 mapsLLLLW
75%4 mapsWWLW
Inferno
0%1 mapsL
50%2 mapsWL
Overpass
0%1 mapsL
–
Anubis
33%3 mapsLLW

Liquipedia CC BY-SA