Sharks vs 100 Thieves (SHK-100T) result: Stake Ranked Episode 2: Closed Qualifier 2026, 3 May 2026

50.5%Win probability before the match49.5%
Map 1SharkswonMap 2Sharkswon
Watch back
No VOD found for this match yet. Pick a channel above to look for it there.

Sharks vs 100 Thieves: what the model expected

Quick read

  • Rating2 Elo points separate Sharks (1747) and 100 Thieves (1745).
  • Head-to-headThese teams have not met yet.
  • FormSharks won 7 of their last 10; 100 Thieves won 5 of 10. Sharks come in slightly sharper. More
  • Bottom lineBefore the start Eloline rated this a coin flip (51% for the side it leaned to); Sharks took it. This number was recomputed afterwards from the rating history, not logged before the match.

Sharks vs 100 Thieves: rosters

SharksElo: #76
IGL
AWP
maxxkorProfile
Player comparison12 months before this match
70%Win rate64%
60Matches, 12 months67
7/10Last 10 matches5/10
won 2Current streakwon 2
23Age23
09/2025On the team since02/2026
800eDPI660
100 ThievesElo: #27VRS: #28
device
rainIGL

Settings source: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0).

Team comparison

SharksTeam100 Thieves
63% (167-99)Map win rate62% (41-25)
22-10Deciding maps won–lost6-6
71%Series wins without dropping a map57%
47 minAverage map length48 min
49%CT-side rounds won60%
50%First half won38%
OpenTeam pageOpen

Source: Liquipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0

Sharks and 100 Thieves: form going into the match

Sharks · 7 of 10 won100 Thieves · 5 of 10 wonWonLost
171517361756177617511745171517361756177617511745
Elo after each match · oldernewer
WBET-M 332–1
WFalcons Force2–0
LBIG1–2
WBetclic Apogee Esports2–0
LNIP0–2
WImperial2–0
L9z0–2
WFluxo W7M2–0
WODDIK2–0
WMIBR Academy2–0
Willwill2–1
WTDK2–0
LNIP0–2
LBIG1–2
LK271–2
WACROBATS2–1
WLavked2–1
WHOTU2–1
Lmagic1–2
LAM Gaming0–2

Map pool: how both teams fare on each map

SharksWin %100 Thieves
0%2 mapsLL
Ancient
67%3 mapsWLW
50%2 mapsLW
Nuke
33%3 mapsWLL
–
Dust II
50%4 mapsLLWW
0%1 mapsL
Inferno
100%1 mapsW
100%1 mapsW
Anubis
0%1 mapsL
–
Mirage
0%2 mapsLL
100%1 mapsW
Overpass
–

Liquipedia CC BY-SA