EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming (EDG-XLG) result: VCT China Stage 1 2025, 19 Apr 2025
59.8%Win probability before the match40.2%
Watch back
Watch each map again
EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming: maps, round scores and veto
Atk4:8Def5:5
Def5:7Atk6:6
MAP 3Fracturedecider
not played
Player scoreboard
Map veto
- XLG Gaming banned Split
- EDward Gaming banned Icebox
- XLG Gaming picked Lotus
- EDward Gaming picked Haven
- XLG Gaming banned Pearl
- EDward Gaming banned Ascent
- Fracture left as decider
EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming: what the model expected
Quick read
- Rating46 Elo points separate EDward Gaming (1513) and XLG Gaming (1467).
- Head-to-headEDward Gaming 1-2 XLG Gaming in 3 meetings since 2024. EDward Gaming took the previous meeting 2-1 at VCT China Kickoff 2025 (). More
- FormEDward Gaming won 7 of their last 10; XLG Gaming won 7 of 10. Neither side has the better run of results. More
- Bottom lineBefore the start, Eloline gave EDward Gaming a 60% chance. This number was recomputed afterwards from the rating history, not logged before the match.
EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming: rosters
Player comparison12 months before this match
| 56% | Win rate | – |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Matches, 12 months | – |
| 6/10 | Last 10 matches | – |
| lost 2 | Current streak | – |
| 230 | ACS | 185 |
| 1.14 | K/D | 0.94 |
| 21 | Age | 21 |
| 08/2022 | On the team since | 09/2024 |
| 168 | eDPI | – |
Settings, ACS, K/D, KAST, ADR source: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0).
Team comparison
EDward GamingTeamXLG Gaming
57% (77-57)Map win rate59% (57-39)
12-5Deciding maps won–lost11-5
53%Series wins without dropping a map54%
45 minAverage map length47 min
56%Attack-side rounds won56%
68%First half won69%
Source: Liquipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0
EDward Gaming vs XLG Gaming: meetings before this one
All 3 meetings
EDward Gaming and XLG Gaming: form going into the match
EDward Gaming · 7 of 10 wonXLG Gaming · 7 of 10 wonWonLost
Elo after each match · oldernewer
Map pool: how both teams fare on each map
EDward Gaming
XLG Gaming
100%2 maps · 1 bansWW
Icebox33%3 mapsLWL









